Dear Reader,
This is the third comment / trackback / pingback that didn't meet with the censor's approval:
Paula Waldron (MoJ):
Paula Waldron's main contribution to the event was the absurd claim that, "the Cabinet Office leads on ombudsman policy."
We asked - could Paula Waldron clarify her statement that, "the cabinet Office leads on ombudsman policy?" That being the case - a claim which we believe to be as far fetched as an Ombudsman Services:Property ombudsman's illogical Final decision - why didn't Francis Maude and Andrea Leadsom reply to any of our emails attempting to alert them to an OS:P ombudsman, "who arrived at decisions in an illogical manner?" (DJS Research Customer Satisfaction Reports) Or an Ombudsman Services executive who permitted maladministration to thrive unchecked?
If Francis Maude and Andrea Leadsom HAD acted on the information we sought to provide them with then surely complainants using this scheme would have been spared the ombudsinjustice and ombudsabuse they were forced to endure?
Isn't the Cabinet Office's real policy to cover-up ombudsinjustice and ombudsabuse - otherwise things would have been very different for complainants? But they weren't.
CONCLUSION:
Time for a public inquiry into Ombudsman Services / The Ombudsman Association / The Cabinet Office and the maladministration ombudsinjustice / abuse complainants were forced to endure as a result of these organisations malfeasance.
Please feel free to comment.
